TLDR
To reduce MOQ shoe manufacturing minimums, you need to change your order structure, not just ask for a smaller number. The fastest path is reducing product complexity: fewer colors, existing outsoles, stock materials, simpler packaging, and a narrower size range. Expect a higher unit price when ordering fewer pairs, because fixed costs like setup, tooling, and material minimums don’t shrink with the order. Beyond direct negotiation, four alternative sourcing routes (trading companies, excess stock, China wholesale markets, and online marketplaces) can get you started at quantities well below standard factory minimums. And two newer strategies, paying tooling upfront and proposing rolling purchase commitments, give factories the financial certainty they need to say yes to smaller batches. Diagnose the actual constraint driving the MOQ before you negotiate.
What Does It Mean to Reduce MOQ Shoe Manufacturing Minimums?
When buyers try to reduce MOQ shoe manufacturing partners impose, they are trying to lower the minimum number of pairs a factory requires before it will produce a style. But here is what most first time buyers misunderstand: it does not mean getting the same shoe, same customization, same delivery speed, and same unit price at a smaller quantity.
In footwear, MOQ is rarely one simple number. It can be tied to the model, the color, the material, or even the size range. A factory that quotes “600 pairs MOQ” might actually mean 300 pairs per colorway across two colors. Split that further across six or seven sizes, and each color/size combination may yield only 40 to 50 pairs. That is where the economics get tight.
MOQ structures in footwear commonly break down into pairs per model, pairs per color, and pairs per size range. If you are sourcing shoes for the first time, ask which of these applies before assuming the number is negotiable.
If you already know your target quantity, colors, and material direction, share those details with a factory before asking about MOQ. That context is what determines whether the number can move.
Why Do Shoe Factories Set MOQs?
Factories are not setting high minimums out of stubbornness. MOQ is the smallest batch where the factory can run your order without losing money. Understanding why helps you reduce MOQ shoe manufacturing costs more effectively.
Setup costs are fixed. Pattern preparation, cutting layout, machine calibration, and workforce allocation take the same time whether you order 100 pairs or 600 pairs. With fewer pairs, each one absorbs more of that cost.
Material suppliers have their own minimums. Leather suppliers, sole manufacturers, and hardware vendors require minimum purchases. If a leather supplier demands enough material for 500 pairs, your 100 pair order forces the shoe factory to overbuy, store excess material, or charge you for the waste.
Outsole molds and tooling are expensive. Shoes are not t shirts. They involve lasts, outsole molds, heel components, and specialized tooling. Custom outsole development is one of the biggest MOQ drivers in footwear because the tooling investment needs enough volume to justify itself.
Production lines run in batches. Changeover between styles disrupts workflow. A factory producing 80,000 pairs per day cannot easily pause a major run to squeeze in 50 pairs of a different shoe.
First time buyers carry risk. Without order history, the factory has no way to know if you will reorder, pay on time, or approve samples correctly. Small first orders from unknown buyers represent the highest risk to reward ratio.
The 10 Factors That Decide Whether Shoe MOQ Can Be Reduced
Most guides tell you to “reduce colors” or “use existing materials” without explaining why those levers work. The real answer is that every shoe order has a constraint tree, and you need to find which branch is setting your MOQ.
1. Factory’s Built In Trial Order Policy
Before negotiating individual constraints, check whether the factory already has a structured pathway for reduced first orders. Some manufacturers build trial order flexibility directly into their operations, which removes much of the back and forth before it starts. LR Shoes Custom, a Shantou, Guangdong based OEM/ODM women’s footwear supplier, is a clear example. Their standard MOQ is 600 pairs per style for 1 to 3 colors, but they offer relaxed limits specifically for trial orders. The factory’s sample policy provides up to 10 single free trial samples for regular styles (freight collect, typically dispatched within 7 days), while exclusive or complex custom samples carry a $100 to $300 fee that is fully deductible against a bulk order. A mandatory physical signed sample before mass production guards against sample to bulk mismatches. Combined with fixed 35 to 50 day lead times, three stage QC tracking (raw material inspection, mid production photos/video, pre loading inspection reports), and US/EU export compliance support, this kind of structured trial framework means buyers spend less time negotiating and more time evaluating product fit. If you are sourcing women’s sandals, flats, wedges, or heels, share your target quantity to get a clear answer on what a trial order looks like.
2. Existing vs. New Design
Adapting an existing factory design (ODM or private label) avoids new patterns, new development, and new sampling. Full OEM with a completely original design usually requires higher MOQ because every component is new. For a first launch, starting from existing flat or loafer styles and adding your branding is often the simplest way to reduce MOQ shoe manufacturing partners require. For more on the ODM approach, see this ODM shoes guide.
3. Existing vs. Custom Outsole
Custom outsole molds are a major cost gate. If you can use a standard outsole the factory already produces, you eliminate one of the most common reasons a factory holds firm on quantity. A plain cork slide sandal built on an existing outsole, for example, carries a lower MOQ threshold than a completely new outsole shape.
4. Pay Tooling Upfront to Lower the Minimum
When a custom outsole or specialized last is unavoidable, a different approach can work: pay for the tooling separately rather than folding it into the per pair price. Factories normally amortize mold costs across the entire production run, which is one reason they insist on higher minimums. If you cover the mold fee (typically $500 to $3,000 depending on complexity) as a standalone payment, the factory no longer needs volume to recoup that investment. Practitioners on Reddit report that offering to absorb tooling and setup costs directly is one of the more effective tactics for unlocking smaller batch sizes, because it removes a genuine financial barrier rather than just asking for a favor.
This works especially well when combined with other tactics like stock materials and fewer colors. The tooling payment handles the biggest fixed cost, while simpler specs handle the rest. Make sure to clarify in writing whether you own the mold after paying for it, and whether the factory will store it for reorders at no additional charge.
5. Stock vs. Custom Materials
When the upper material requires a special color dye, a custom finish, or a minimum roll purchase, the material supplier’s MOQ becomes your MOQ. Using stock materials already in the factory’s supply chain sidesteps this problem entirely. Practitioners on Reddit report that using in stock materials, existing colors, or combining multiple products from the same material base is one of the most practical workarounds for MOQ constraints.
6. Number of Colorways
More colors means more material changeovers, more cutting layouts, and more QC separation. A 600 pair total order in three colors becomes 200 pairs per color, which may fall below the per color minimum. Launching in one or two colors instead of four is one of the highest impact ways to reduce MOQ shoe manufacturing runs demand.
7. Limit Your Size Range
Even a low total MOQ must cover enough pairs across your size range. If you need sizes 5 through 11 and only order 100 total pairs, some sizes will have fewer than 15 pairs. That creates production inefficiency and makes inventory allocation difficult.
A practical solution: trim the size range for your first order. Analyze your target market’s sales data (or best available proxy data from your ecommerce analytics, Amazon category data, or wholesale feedback) and identify the three to five sizes that represent the bulk of demand. For women’s shoes in the US market, sizes 7 through 9 typically account for 50% or more of sales volume. Launching with five sizes instead of eight or nine can drop your per size quantity into a workable range while still covering most of your addressable market. You can expand the full size run on reorders once you have sell through data to justify it.
8. Choose a Simpler Shoe Category to Lower the Minimum
Not all shoe types carry the same MOQ floor. A flat sandal with a simple upper and an existing outsole involves fewer components, less assembly time, and simpler QC than a heeled boot with a zipper, lining, and multiple material panels. The more construction steps a shoe requires, the higher the setup costs and the more rigid the MOQ becomes.
For brands launching their first product, starting with a structurally simple category is one of the most overlooked ways to reduce MOQ shoe manufacturing runs require. Slide sandals, basic flats, espadrilles, and slip ons are among the lowest complexity categories. Browse women’s sandal styles or flat and loafer options to see constructions where factory minimums tend to be most flexible. Once a style sells and you have real demand data, graduating to more complex constructions (wedges, heels, boots) at higher quantities makes sense.
9. Packaging and Branding
Custom shoe boxes, printed tissue, hangtags, and branded insoles often have separate supplier minimums. Standard packaging for a first run can meaningfully reduce MOQ shoe manufacturing facilities set, keeping cash available for product development instead. For guidance on building a complete product specification, see how to build a spec sheet for private label footwear.
10. Factory Size, Schedule, and Manufacturing Region
Smaller, more flexible manufacturers are generally more willing to take lower MOQ orders than large factories optimized for high volume runs. Timing matters too: ordering during a factory’s slower months gives your small order a better chance of fitting into the production schedule.
Geography also plays a role. China remains the dominant footwear manufacturing hub, but not all regions within China (or outside it) carry the same MOQ norms. Factories in Southeast Asia (Vietnam, Indonesia) are increasingly competitive for athletic and casual footwear, though their minimums tend to be comparable to or higher than mid sized Chinese factories. Portugal and Spain serve the European luxury and mid range market with lower minimums (sometimes 200 to 300 pairs) but at significantly higher unit costs. India and Brazil offer competitive pricing on certain categories like leather sandals but involve different quality and logistics considerations.
Within China, Guangdong province (especially Shantou and Dongguan) has a dense concentration of women’s fashion footwear factories with the infrastructure to handle flexible orders. The variety of suppliers in one region means more negotiating options and faster sample turnaround. For details on typical timelines, see how long it takes to manufacture women’s sandals.
Practical Ways to Reduce MOQ Shoe Manufacturing Orders Require
Once you understand what drives the minimum, you can pull the right levers. Here is the priority list, ordered by impact.
Start with ODM instead of full OEM. Adapting an existing factory construction means the last, outsole, and basic pattern already exist. You customize materials, colors, and branding. This is the single most effective way to reduce MOQ shoe manufacturing facilities expect for a first order.
Browse women’s sandal constructions or wedge and heel styles to see what base constructions are already available before requesting a fully custom design.
Keep the existing last and outsole. Custom tooling raises both cost and minimum quantity. If the factory already makes a sandal in the shape you want, use their outsole. If custom tooling is unavoidable, paying for it upfront as a separate fee is the next best option.
Limit your launch to one or two colors. This is hard advice for designers who want variety, but for the first run, boring production choices can be smart business choices.
Choose stock materials. Ask the factory which upper materials and colors they have on hand.
Trim the size range. Focus your first order on the three to five highest volume sizes. Expand on reorders.
Pick a simpler shoe category. Start with slides, flats, or espadrilles rather than complex constructions.
Pay a setup fee or accept higher unit price. Maple Sourcing recommends asking what setup costs are and offering to cover them separately, which makes a smaller run possible without the factory absorbing the loss. A one time fee is often more effective than offering a small per pair bump.
Plan phased production. Rather than trying to squeeze an entire multi style collection into a single low MOQ order, break the launch into phases. Produce one or two styles first. Use the sales data from those styles to justify the next batch. This approach reduces risk per order, keeps working capital free, and gives the factory a clearer picture of your business trajectory. Factories are far more receptive to a 300 pair first order when they can see a concrete plan for a 600 pair follow up in 60 to 90 days.
Propose a rolling purchase commitment. A rolling commitment is different from a vague promise to “order more later.” It means presenting the factory with a written forecast, something like: “We plan to order 300 pairs now, 500 pairs in Q3, and 800 pairs in Q4, contingent on sell through.” This gives the factory enough visibility to justify accepting a smaller initial order. Some factories will even lock in pricing across the commitment if volumes are specified. The key is putting it in writing. Verbal promises carry no weight in factory decision making, but a signed purchase intent with approximate quantities and timelines signals a serious buyer.
Show a realistic reorder plan. Factories take small first orders more seriously when they see a thought out forecast. But vague promises like “we will order thousands later” without preparation are not persuasive. Come with a clear plan.
Order at the right time. Factories have peak and off peak periods. A small order has better odds of acceptance when the production line has open capacity.
4 Alternative Sourcing Routes That Bypass Standard MOQs
Direct factory negotiation is not the only path. Four alternative sourcing routes let buyers get shoes at quantities far below typical production minimums, each with distinct trade offs.
Buy Through a Trading Company
Trading companies (sometimes called sourcing agents) sit between buyers and factories. They aggregate orders from multiple clients and place combined production runs, which means each individual buyer can order well below the factory’s standard MOQ.
The trade off is straightforward: you pay more per pair (typically 10% to 30% above direct factory price) because the trading company takes a margin. You also lose some visibility into which factory actually produces your shoes, and communication passes through an intermediary.
When this works best:
- You need fewer than the factory’s minimum but still want some customization (branding, color, material selection)
- You lack sourcing experience in China and want someone to handle factory coordination
- You want to test multiple styles across different factories without opening accounts at each one
When to be cautious: if you cannot verify which factory the trading company uses, quality consistency becomes harder to enforce. Ask whether you can receive mid production QC photos and pre shipment inspection reports.
Source from Excess Stock and Overruns
Every large production run generates some excess. Factories overcut materials, buyers cancel orders mid production, or brands reject shipments over minor cosmetic issues. This surplus ends up available at steep discounts, often with no MOQ at all or minimums as low as 50 to 100 pairs.
The advantages are obvious: immediate availability (no 35 to 50 day lead time), lower prices, and no tooling or setup fees. The disadvantages are just as clear: you cannot choose colors, materials, or sizes. What exists in the warehouse is what you get.
Where to find excess stock:
- Directly from factories. Many manufacturers in Guangdong will sell overruns if you ask. It is not advertised but commonly available.
- Through liquidation channels and closeout wholesalers.
- At trade shows, where factory reps sometimes mention available surplus.
This route works well for discount retailers, online flash sale operators, or brands that need fill in inventory between production cycles. It does not work for anyone building a consistent brand identity around specific styles and colorways.
Visit China Wholesale Markets
Physical wholesale shoe markets in China remain one of the most underrated sourcing options for small quantity buyers. The largest and most relevant include:
- Guangzhou Zhanxi Shoe Wholesale Market in Guangdong province, with thousands of stalls spread across multiple buildings
- Yiwu International Trade City, which covers general merchandise including footwear
- Wenzhou shoe markets in Zhejiang, particularly strong for women’s fashion shoes
At these markets, you can buy as few as a dozen pairs of a style. Prices are close to factory gate because many stall operators either run their own small workshops or buy directly from nearby factories. You can touch and inspect the shoes, negotiate face to face, and walk away with goods the same day.
The practical challenges are real. You need to be physically present (or send a trusted agent). Communication is primarily in Mandarin. Quality ranges dramatically from stall to stall. And since these are finished goods from existing production, customization options are limited to basics like adding your label or swapping insoles.
Several sourcing consultants on YouTube recommend visiting Guangzhou markets specifically for women’s sandals and fashion flats, noting that the variety and price competitiveness are difficult to match online. Budget at least three to four days for a proper sourcing trip if this is your first visit.
Source via Online Marketplaces
Platforms like Alibaba, 1688 (Alibaba’s domestic Chinese platform), DHgate, and Made in China connect buyers with thousands of shoe suppliers, many of whom advertise low MOQs. These marketplaces have genuinely changed the accessibility of small batch sourcing over the past few years.
What actually works on these platforms:
- Filtering suppliers by MOQ to find those offering 50 to 200 pair minimums
- Using Alibaba’s Trade Assurance for payment protection on first orders
- Requesting samples before committing to any bulk purchase
- Checking supplier response quality and production photos as vetting signals
What doesn’t work: trusting every listed MOQ at face value. Practitioners on Alibaba forums report that advertised MOQs are frequently marketing numbers. The real minimum often surfaces only after you send a detailed inquiry with your exact specs. A supplier advertising “10 pairs MOQ” for a custom shoe will almost certainly require more once custom materials or branding enter the conversation.
1688 deserves special mention. It is designed for the Chinese domestic market, so prices are typically lower than Alibaba. The interface is entirely in Chinese, but many sourcing agents and browser translation tools make it navigable. For buyers willing to invest a bit of effort, 1688 can surface factory direct prices that Alibaba sellers mark up significantly.
One important caveat for all marketplace sourcing: verify whether the seller is the actual manufacturer or a trading company reselling. The distinction affects price, quality control, and your ability to reorder. A good test is asking for factory photos or a virtual tour. Genuine manufacturers can usually provide these within a day or two.
For any route, confirming that the supplier understands your target market’s compliance requirements is essential. An overview of export compliance for US imports can help you know what to ask.
Example: Why “$2 More Per Pair” Often Fails
A real world scenario from Reddit illustrates why attempts to reduce MOQ shoe manufacturing quantities through small price bumps usually fall short. A buyer was working with a footwear manufacturer that had a 600 pair standard MOQ and a 400 pair first order MOQ at $44 per pair. The buyer wanted 200 pairs across two colors and offered $1 to $2 extra per pair. Commenters pointed out that halving the MOQ is a significant ask, and a small price bump probably would not offset the factory’s lost efficiency.
The math explains why. An extra $2 on 200 pairs generates only $400 more revenue. If the real constraint is setup time, material minimums, or line scheduling, $400 does not come close to covering the gap. A better approach: ask what drives the MOQ, then offer to change that driver. Fewer colors, no new mold, stock materials, a paid tooling fee, or a rolling purchase commitment will usually move the needle further than a marginal price increase.
Factory MOQ vs. Brand MOQ
One footwear consultant on LinkedIn made a point that changes how smart buyers approach this problem: your ideal order quantity should come from your own budget, sales plan, storage capacity, and risk tolerance, not from the factory’s default number.
Think of it as two separate numbers. Factory MOQ is what the factory needs to produce efficiently. Brand MOQ is the maximum quantity you can responsibly buy based on expected sell through and cash flow.
If factory MOQ exceeds brand MOQ, you have several options: simplify the shoe, use ODM instead of full OEM, pay a setup fee or higher unit price, pay tooling upfront, propose a rolling purchase commitment, limit your size range, choose a simpler shoe category, combine quantities across similar styles, use one of the four alternative sourcing routes above, or switch to a factory built for smaller batches. All of these are proven ways to reduce MOQ shoe manufacturing partners typically enforce.
Before negotiating with any supplier, answer these questions:
- How many pairs can we realistically sell in the first season?
- How much cash can we tie up in inventory?
- How many colorways and sizes can we support without overstock?
- What is the reorder lead time if we sell out?
The true cost of MOQ is not just the product cost. It includes sampling, tooling, freight, duties, storage, capital tied up in unsold inventory, and markdown risk on styles that do not sell. For a broader look at budgeting, see this guide on launching a private label shoe line on a small budget.
How to Ask a Factory to Reduce MOQ Shoe Manufacturing Runs
Do not open with “Can you lower MOQ?” That question tells the factory nothing useful. Instead, share enough detail that the factory can identify where flexibility exists.
A better message:
“We want to launch this style as a controlled pilot, not a one time bargain order. Our target first run is [X] pairs because that fits our sales forecast and cash flow. We plan to reorder [Y] pairs in [timeframe] if sell through meets projections. Can you help us identify what is driving the standard MOQ, whether that is material, outsole, color, size run, packaging, or production setup? We are open to using stock materials, existing outsoles, fewer colors, a narrower size range, standard packaging, paying tooling costs upfront, or a separate setup fee if that makes a smaller first order workable.”
Practitioners in manufacturing forums describe MOQ as having three floors: a cost floor (setup, labor, tooling), a material floor (supplier minimums for leather, outsoles, hardware), and a strategic floor (whether the factory sees enough future value in the relationship). Negotiate against the right floor.
For guidance on what happens after the factory says yes, read about pre production sample approval.
Red Flags When a Factory Offers Very Low MOQ
Low MOQ is not automatically good. Watch for these warning signs:
- The supplier promises very low MOQ, full custom design, low price, and fast delivery all at once. That combination is almost never real.
- The supplier cannot explain whether MOQ is driven by material, tooling, setup, or scheduling.
- The supplier skips sample approval or changes materials between sample and bulk. Read more on ensuring bulk matches your sample.
- The supplier refuses in process QC updates or pre shipment inspection.
- The supplier says yes to every request without discussing trade offs.
Reddit discussions on clothing startups echo this concern: low MOQ factories sound attractive until buyers discover that quality consistency and timelines suffer when a factory juggles too many tiny orders without the right systems.
The same caution applies to marketplace sourcing. A supplier on Alibaba advertising 1 pair MOQ on a fully custom shoe is almost certainly either a trading company adding large markups, or a bait and switch that will reveal the real minimum after you invest time in sampling.
When Low MOQ Is the Right Choice
Low MOQ shoe manufacturing fits specific situations: launching a first product, testing a new style, running a boutique or private label program, trying a seasonal trend, entering a new market, or protecting cash flow when demand is uncertain.
The advantages are clear. Lower inventory risk, faster market feedback, less capital exposure, and the ability to iterate before committing to volume. Phased production amplifies these benefits by letting you treat each small order as a data collection exercise that informs the next one.
When Higher MOQ Is Better
If you have proven demand, confirmed wholesale purchase orders, or need a fully custom outsole and material, accepting the factory’s standard MOQ is often the smarter play. Larger production runs deliver lower unit cost, stronger factory priority, and better margin potential. You also get more leverage for QC enforcement and delivery commitments.
The decision is not “low MOQ good, high MOQ bad.” It is about matching order size to your evidence of demand. For a deeper look at choosing the right manufacturing partner as you scale, see this guide to choosing a manufacturer.
Reducing MOQ for Women’s Sandals, Flats, Wedges, and Heels
For buyers testing a women’s footwear program, the most practical way to reduce MOQ shoe manufacturing numbers starts from an existing construction with customized materials, colors, or branding layered on after sample approval. A woven espadrille flat or a metallic wedge sandal built on an existing outsole, for example, involves far less development than a fully original design. These simpler categories inherently carry lower minimums because they require fewer components and less specialized tooling.
LR Shoes Custom supports this approach with a standard MOQ of 600 pairs per style for 1 to 3 colors, with relaxed limits for trial orders. The factory’s sample policy provides up to 10 single free trial samples for regular styles (freight collect, typically dispatched within 7 days), while exclusive or complex custom samples require a $100 to $300 fee that is fully deductible against a bulk order. A mandatory physical signed sample before mass production serves as a safeguard against sample to bulk mismatches.
If you are ready to explore whether your shoe idea fits a trial order or standard production run, share your target quantity and specs to get a clear answer on what is feasible.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can you actually reduce MOQ shoe manufacturing facilities set?
Yes, but only if you reduce the cost or risk behind the MOQ. Common levers include using existing designs, standard outsoles, stock materials, fewer colors, a narrower size range, simpler shoe categories, standard packaging, a higher unit price, upfront tooling payment, a rolling purchase commitment, or a paid setup fee. Simply asking for a lower number without changing anything else rarely works.
Why is shoe MOQ higher than apparel MOQ?
Shoes involve more components and process steps than most apparel. Outsole molds, lasts, lasting, material coordination across uppers and linings, hardware, stitching, assembly, finishing, and QC all add complexity. Each component may have its own minimum, creating a chain effect.
What is a realistic low MOQ for shoes?
There is no universal number. Footwear MOQ can range from under 100 pairs for private label adaptations of existing styles to 500 or more pairs for fully custom OEM designs. The practical question is whether the MOQ fits the shoe type, customization level, and factory structure.
Does low MOQ always mean higher unit price?
Almost always. Lower quantities spread setup, tooling, labor, material, and QC costs across fewer pairs. The unit price rises, but total upfront investment drops. The trade off is higher cost per pair versus lower inventory risk.
Is ODM better than OEM for reducing MOQ?
For a first run, typically yes. ODM adapts an existing factory design, which avoids new molds, lasts, patterns, and development. Full OEM gives more originality but usually raises MOQ because it requires more tooling and engineering.
Can I pay for tooling separately to get a lower MOQ?
Yes. When you cover mold or tooling costs as a standalone payment, the factory no longer needs to amortize that expense across a large production run. This removes one of the biggest fixed cost barriers to small batch production. Clarify in writing who owns the mold and whether storage fees apply for future reorders.
Does limiting my size range actually reduce MOQ?
It can. If the factory’s MOQ is partly driven by needing a minimum number of pairs per size, cutting from eight sizes to five means the same total order yields more pairs per size. This improves production efficiency and often makes a lower total quantity acceptable.
Should I choose a specific manufacturing region to get lower MOQ?
Region matters, but it is not a silver bullet. Portugal and Spain typically offer lower minimums (200 to 300 pairs) at higher unit costs. Guangdong, China has a dense concentration of mid sized factories with flexible MOQ structures for women’s fashion footwear. Southeast Asian factories tend to have minimums comparable to or higher than Chinese factories, with strengths in athletic and casual categories.
What should I offer instead of simply asking for lower MOQ?
Offer a practical trade off: fewer colors, stock materials, an existing outsole, a narrower size range, standard packaging, a higher unit price, upfront tooling payment, a setup fee, phased production plan, or a rolling purchase commitment. Identify the specific constraint behind the MOQ and negotiate against that, not just the number.
When should I accept the factory’s standard MOQ instead of trying to reduce it?
When you have confirmed demand, need full custom tooling, want the lowest possible unit cost, or need priority production scheduling. Trying to reduce MOQ shoe manufacturing quantities makes sense for testing. Accepting the standard minimum makes sense for scaling.
0 comments